Connect with us


Entertainment

Former Wimbledon champion and ex-world No.1, Simona Halep is banned for 4-years following anti-doping violation

Published

on

Two-time women’s Grand Slam champion, Simona Halep has been banned from tennis for four years after breaching the Tennis Anti-Doping Programme.

 

Advertisement

The Romanian had already been suspended while an investigation into potential doping was carried out and she has now received a lengthy ban from the sport.

 

Advertisement

Halep was automatically withdrawn from the recent US Open due to her doping suspension.

 

Advertisement

The International Tennis Integrity Agency [ITIA] confirmed on Tuesday that an independent tribunal had decided the punishment due to two separate incidents involving the former Wimbledon champion.

 

Advertisement

Her first positive test for a banned substance came during last year’s US Open when a sample highlighted the prohibited substance roxadustat during a routine urine test. The substance stimulates production of hemoglobin and red blood cells.

 

Advertisement

It is most often used to treat sufferers of anaemia but is on WADA’s Prohibited Substance list due to it being considered a blood doping agent.

READ ALSO:   BREAKING: Iniobong Umoren: Police Release Statement As Family Cries Out

The second breach of the TADP charges relates to ‘irregularities in her athlete biological passport’.

Advertisement

Halep has denied any wrongdoing and published an emotional statement stressing that she is ‘shocked and disappointed by the verdict’ and will be appealing it at the court of Court of Arbitration for Sport and will be taking legal action against the supplement company she insists gave her contaminated goods.

Part of her response said: ‘I have never knowingly or intentionally used any prohibited substance.

Advertisement

 

‘I refuse to accept their decision of a four-year ban.

Advertisement

 

‘While I am grateful to finally have an outcome following numerous unfounded delays and a feeling of living in purgatory for over a year, I am both shocked and disappointed by their decision.

Advertisement

 

‘I am eternally grateful for the outpouring of support I have received from my family, friends, and tennis fans around the world.

Advertisement

 

‘I am continuing to train and do everything in my power to clear my name of these false allegations and return to the court,’ she added.

Advertisement
READ ALSO:   Breaking: Former BBNaija’s star, Joseph Ada dies in the US

 

After publishing their findings, the ITIA explained Halep had committed intentional Anti-Doping Rule Violations under Article 2 of the TADP.

Advertisement

Those violations as outlined by the organisation relate to: ‘the presence and use of roxadustat as evidenced in Halep’s urine sample collected on 29 August 2022 at the US Open’ and ‘use of a prohibited substance or method during 2022, based on collection and analysis of 51 blood samples provided by the player as part of the ABP programme’.

Advertisement

 

The tribunal agreed with Halep’s argument that she had taken a contaminated supplement, however, it was decided the levels of roxadustat found in the positive sample were too high for that to be the only cause.

Advertisement

 

Decision-makers also sided with three independent Athlete Passport Management Unit (APMU) representatives that ‘likely doping’ was the reason for the irregularities.

Advertisement

 

READ ALSO:   Actress Mide Martins Breaks Silence Over Abandoned Brother

Her ban will run from 7 October 2022 until 6 October 2026 and Halep can appeal the decision.

Advertisement

 

Karen Moorhouse, Chief Executive Officer at the ITIA, explained the body’s findings, stating: ‘After a complex and rigorous hearing process, we welcome the independent tribunal’s decision.

Advertisement

‘The volume of evidence for the tribunal to consider in both the roxadustat and ABP proceedings was substantial.

Advertisement

‘The ITIA has followed the proper processes as we would with any other individual – in accordance with the World Anti-Doping Code – fulfilling our purpose and responsibility to uphold the principle of fair competition, on behalf of the sport. The panel recognised that appropriate procedure had been followed within the written decision.

‘We do understand the significant public interest in these cases and remain committed to being as transparent as possible and the full decision will be published in due course.’

Advertisement
Advertisement







Also Read...